Pat is mostly know as the house guitarist A Prairie Home Companion and most of his song combine witty jokes with wide gourmet of country, blues and folk guitar licks. This song is very different, being a strangely non-moralizing gospel tinged ditty. It only looks like a religious song from the outside, in the same way it only seems like there is some physical altercation going on in the first verse.
In fact, the first verse is saying: we were having discussions and big disagreements about major issues, but it was fun because we could do it in friendship. In the end, we are on this road together. For me, as an atheist, it means ‘death’, the end, nothingness, but for people with a more religious background, this may mean ‘heaven’, the ultimate goal, all. We may differ in what we expect to find behind the Door, but that we are united on our road towards that Door. There is also a bit of Heidegger’s Sein zum Tode.
I will not go deeper into analyzing the lyrics – people don’t understand why you can write a 25 page paper on one poem. I still think there is no better tribute to any poem than demonstrating it takes pages and pages to do what the poet does in a few line.
But here are the chords. If you like this stuff you should also check my post on Blind Connie Williams.
I have transcribed the basic chords, which are dead easy. The diminished chords used as transitions, often to the A are explained by Pat himself in this video.
This guitar was given to me by a very good friend. I really didn’t get around to playing it because the intonation was a bit off… but this turned out the be only caused by the nut raiser. There are no brand indications whatsoever, but the might have worn off or may have been painted over.
It was imported straight from the US together with its little sister:
Hawaiian music hype
It is not a blues-guitar. It is an Hawaiian guitar and a response to early 20th century hype of Hawaiian music. It was the very same hype that put the ukulele in our collective memory. Remember that during depression days of the late 30s, even the Martin guitar factory only survived thanks to ukes.
Following the 1915 Panama Pacific International Exposition in San Francisco, Hawaiian music became very fashionable in the United States, leading to two predominant Hawaiian-music correspondence schools in the ’20s and ’30s: Oahu and Bronson. Oahu was headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio, while Bronson’s office was in Detroit, Michigan. (It is unlikely that either city was a hotbed of Hawaiian culture at the time.) Each of these outfits sold lessons by mail (often attempting to enlist advanced students as teachers and representatives) and featured its own line of guitars.
Oahu-labeled guitars were made for the Oahu Publishing Co. of Cleveland, which called itself “The World’s Largest Guitar Dealer” in 1935.
The Honolulu Conservatory of Music was established in Flint, Michigan in the late ’20s by Harry Stanley and his half-brother, George Bronson. Stanley founded Oahu in 1933; Bronson started the Bronson Music & Sales Co. in Detroit about the same time.
Oahu offered a variety of squareneck and roundneck acoustic guitars — most were made in Chicago by Kay and Harmony. The most common are inexpensive ($22.50 in 1935) birch guitars with a dark brown finish. More expensive models were available; I used to own an all-mahogany small-bodied squareneck with black-and-white “rope” style binding ($65 in 1935). The top of the line was a rosewood/spruce jumbo with “pearl” inlay, soundhole ring and top trim. These were $158 in 1935 — more than $2100 in 2004 dollars.
But is it an Oahu guitar?
Oahu did not manufacture these guitars themselves. In fact they were mainly a publishing company focusing on sheet music and instruction books. They branched out into instruments, but had them build by other companies.
In the 30’s the company name was consistently stamped inside the sound hole. Our guitar does not have that however, although it looks very similar. As stated earlier, Oahu did not build guitars, they were built by either Kay or Harmony.
The Harmony company, founded at the end of the 19th century, was bought by mail order company Sears-Roebuck & Co in 1916, simply to corner the ukulele market. In the late 1930s, Harmony “also bought brand names from the bankrupt Oscar Schmidt Co.—La Scala, Stella, and Sovereign. They sold not only Harmony products, but instruments under the Sears name, Silvertone, and a variety of trade names—Vogue, Valencia, Johnny Marvin, Monterey, Stella, and others.”
Note the rounded off headstock, which is almost never found on Oahu-branded guitars:
But then again, have a look at this one:
And here’s a headstock from the Bronson Guitar Company: not very different, but note the upside-down tuners. Which are actually the correct way around when playing lap slide.
There seem to be Oahu’s without the brand stamped in the soundhole. On Jake Wildwood’s blog I found this very similar 50k model without the Oahu brand stamp. It does have the logo on the headstock:
It has the fake binding painted on the soundhole like mine, but also around the edges of the guitar. The most surprising thing, which is why it caught my eye, is that this guitar has the exact same bridge as mine. Jake writes:
The standard metal bridge is very recognizable because it has pyramid ornamentation. I was suprised to find this Youtube video of another squareneck Oahu with that same Regal/Oscar Schmidt bridge:
But it has more:
painted binding only around the soundhole
only light in the sunburst is around the bridge
Oahu guitars usually came with a very strange metal molded bridge, which was bolted down as you cannot glue metal to wood. So maybe the bridge was replaced. The original looks like this:
Most distinctive feature of our guitar are the diamond fret markers:
All the material I could find is pointing to the the 1940s:
Stamp on the back
There is no manufacturer or company referenced inside the guitar. There is only this:
This song from C.W. Stoneking‘s last album is maybe one of the strongest songs he’s ever written. Strangely, he tried to write the perfect Hawaiian sunset crooning tune before, and almost succeeded with ‘Jungle Lullaby’ in 2008.
Anyway, here are the mystery chords of ‘On A Desert Isle’: all natural minor chords are replaced by diminished chords. In the intro this is very apparent as he actually plays C – Em – F – Em-Ebm-Dm – G7 – C.
In the first line C – Edim – F Fdim – C both diminshed chords function as (and can be replaced with simple minor chords Em an Fm). The first (Em) is absolutely natural, and the second is in fact a standard blues and jazz move: making the IV minor (i.e. Fm). Otis Span uses it here (from F to Fm on “we’s allright” and “shoot my baby, etc..). This same progression even made some nineties kids millionaires, it’s so fucking special…
E dim: I – IIIb – Vb or E – G – Bb played 312XXX — is indeed not as CW remarks a Gm6 but an Em chord. And can be substituted for a simple Em chord!
F dim: F – G# – B played X213XX
B dim: X869XX
Dm7b5: played X5656X
C9/E is the best way to describe the XX233X chord leading into the chorus. C9 by itself would be a great way to go to F, but putting the E note in the bass makes so much sense.
For now, I only transcribed the basic chords for the two sections, not the details, which I will bring in later.
Ik was nog maar net naar beneden gesukkeld, half wakker en mij ook van geen aanslag op de mensheid bewust, toen mijn vrouw mij er ernstig op attendeerde: “Kun je dat geloven: Trump heeft gewonnen!” Ik vreesde natuurlijk het allerergste (fatalistisch als ik ben), maar het viel echt reuze mee: er was zelfs nog koffie.
De kinderen waren ook bezorgd: “Papa, Trump heeft gewonnen!” en ik zei zoiets van “Remco, wij wonen nog altijd in België en dat is Amerika. De mensen in Amerika hebben gestemd en Trump heeft gewonnen, maar er is nog nooit een president geweest die Amerika helemaal heeft kunnen veranderen.”
Gisteren belde ik met m’n moeder om een bezoekje te regelen en ze zei: “Ja, goed dat ge belt, ik was nog maar zjuust terug van winkel, want we waren zo laat opgestaan. Ik kon weer ni slapen, naar de verkiezingen in Amerika gekeken, hebt ge dat gezien van dieje… euh… Trumf? Ik ben onze pa nog gaan oproepen want die sliep al…”
Neen, ik had het niet gezien. Ik lees geen kranten en kijk geen nieuws meer, maar het is duidelijk dat zelfs zo er geen ontsnappen aan is. Het is ook niet correct: ik lees en kijk wel, maar enkel in meta-modus: niet om te kijken wat er gebeurd is, maar om te zien hoe er bericht wordt. Vooral dat vond ik net zo angstaanjagend: de absolute éénstemmigheid in de afkeuring van een presidentskandidaat zowel in Europa en US, bij democraten en zelfs bij veel republikeinen, ter linker en ter rechter zijde, door oud en jong, in mainstream – en sociale media…
In het postmoderne discours maakt de connotatie niets meer uit: of je iemand ophemelt of uitscheldt maakt niet zoveel meer uit. Het is minder belangrijk wat er over je gezegd en geschreven wordt dan hoeveel er over je wordt bericht.
De beste beschrijving lijkt mij: This presidential election had ‘Trump’ written all over it — no wonder that this was the name that came out of the ballot box.
It may be due to Flanders irrevocable ties to the Holy See or just because of the numerous musical Italian immigrants, but there are a lot of Italian Geloso amps for sale in the low countries.
Giovanni (John) Geloso (1901 – 1969) was an Argentinian immigrant who established one of the most important electronics factories in pre and postwar Italy. More information on the Geloso company can be found here.
This is a 17W 1967 Geloso G3215:
An 1967 handwired, all tube 17W amp running a set of tubes very familiar to the guitar player and hence affordable! ECC83 or 12AX7 for the preamp, EL84 power tubes and a EZ81 rectifier. In fact, this is the exact tube complement of an earlier incarnation of the Vox AC15.
Filaments of the preamp tubes are run off negative DC, which assures absolutely noiseless operation. And there is the extra filter coil often omitted in guitar amps.
This amp still had all the original Geloso branded tubes:
The amp was sold to me in working condition. In the context of tube technology, this often means, the tubes glow up. So it was in this case, tubes glowed, but no sound. Things only changed when I changed the mains power switch from 240V to 220V – then this little Italian beast came to live. It is loud, noiseless and has an absolutely acceptable guitar tone. I decided to install an input jack and keep the amp stock for now. The big yellow capacitors are not Geloso, but Sprague, date coded 1966, 26th week.
Input jacks are shielded from the rest of the circuit. The wiring is to a very high standard as are the components, who are holding up perfectly, even after half a century.
An additional advantage of these Geloso amps is that they allow you to drive any speaker from 1.5 ohms up to a 1000 ohms.
For now, I installed speaker jack in such a way that you can switch the ends to different poles on the output transformer.
Cleaned up, input jack and chicken heads installed:
There are few interesting videos of tube radio guitar amps conversions on the web. All of them however, are single-ended amplifiers, i.e. using only one power tube (like the Fender Champ). As far as real conversions go, this is about the only video that’s relevant:
Just using the phono input to plug in your guitar is easy, here’s an instructional video if you need that:
The silly dilemma in the second video sums up the reason why there is so little information on the web about conversions:
If you want, you can play guitar on any tube radio with a phone input, you just need a connector cord.
To make an optimum guitar amp out of the tube radio components, you will have to completely rebuild it, so you can win some of the power the previously went to the RF section tubes for your amp. If the radio was a stereo unit, you want to use the power available for a mono channel.
So it’s either use as is or rebuild completely, there is no middle road or easy guide. In fact, when cheap generic strattera online no rx buying a tube radio set, keep the following pointer in mind:
the more tubes, the better
more channels is better (stereo is twice the power)
the bigger the power transformer, the better
look for radios with ECC83 (preamp) EL84 (power) and EZ81 (rectifier)
avoid radios from the 40’s
bigger speakers is better, better change that the output transformer(s) can be used
On the other hand, I have not seen a tube radio that does not contain all elements of a 5W Champ head: often tubes, sockets, chassis, mains transformer, terminal strips and components can be salvaged. This leaves you only with the cost of a very good output transformer for 5W single ended amp (40 euro max), some jacks, a pilot light and pots, just to build your own 5W monster (with vintage power transformer :-p)
So, there was work at the drawing board…
And the vibrato section:
Looking for the right components:
The bloodsucker from the amp parts store charge 25 euros for a Tweed Deluxe tagboard, which is just a stupid piece of cardboard. In the GAMMA store I found this riveting set for 11 euros. The rings are a bit larger than normal tagboards, but work just fine.
Yes, there is a very nice and decent guitar amp hidden inside this scruffy old Philips radio, all the components except a suitable output transformer and speaker are present to solder up this nice gem:
Huh? Why? How?
Power rectifierEZ81 — If you are in Europe and hunting for tube radio with any value in the guitar amp field, check for this rectifier tube. If you see it, buy the radio! This tube is used is the early Vox amp, up to the AC15 as power rectifier. Most vintage American amp you will be looking at require at least 3 different voltage from the transformers: a high voltage, 6.3V for the tube filaments and 5V for the rectifier. The EZ81 does not require the special 5V, just feeds off the high voltage.
In this way, it is just like a Vox Pacemaker — although below schematic is from a Cambridge Reverb (the same amp + reverb):
Or an AC-15, also using an EZ81:
And all of these are unlike any 50’s Fender amp, which require three voltages on the transformer 6.3V, HV and 5V especially for the rectifier:
2 Power tubes EL84 & 1 Preamp tube ECC83 — if the transformer can power this in our radio, we need only one extra ECC83 tube to make a Vox Pacemaker. It uses 2 x EL84, 2 x ECC83 and an EZ81. The Philips radio powers and additional 5 tubes for RF purposes, so it is certain that this transformer from a piece of €10 junk can function as the heart of a Vox Pacemaker, Vox AC-15 or Marshall 18W…. value: $75. My calculation seems to indicate this transformer could pull 5.4A on the high voltage. I don’t believe you could find one that would feed anything more than a 25W amp.
The only thing that is missing, is the output transformer, which will cost around €50. Chassis, resistors (after measuring), 6.3V pilot light and mounting screw can all be salvage from the zombie corpse.
I really think you could use a lot of the power transformers in old radios, but the output transformers from household radio sets will never be strong enough.